|
Mark L. Callister
Shareholder and Director
MEMBERSHIPS
Utah Supreme Court
California Supreme Court
U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
U.S. District Court, Utah
U.S. District Court, Central District of California
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Utah Chapter of the Federal Bar Association, Director
EDUCATION
University of Utah, Magna Cum Laude, Phi Beta Kappa, 1981
University of Utah College of Law, Order of the Coif, 1984
Executive Editor, Utah Law Review
Traynor Legal Writing Award
PRACTICE AREAS
Antitrust and Commercial Litigation
Mr. Callister has extensive experience in commercial and business litigation with an emphasis on antitrust, lender liability, and complex contract disputes. Mr. Callister served as Vice Chairman of the State Action Immunity Committee of the American Bar Association Antitrust Section. He was appointed Special Assistant Attorney General for the State of Montana in 1996 and has represented clients in antitrust investigations before the United States Federal Trade Commission and the Utah Attorney General's Office. He was recently named one of Utah's "legal elite" by the Utah Business Magazine.
PUBLICATIONS
Price Fixing - An Antitrust Trap for the Unwary, Zions Bank Community Magazine October 2005.
State Action Practice Manual, Co-author, Section of Antitrust Law, American Bar Association, Chicago, 2000.
Proving Antitrust Damages, Co-author, Section of Antitrust Law, American Bar Association, Chicago, 1996.
The Freedom of Information Act Attorney's Fee Provision: Judicial Interpretation of the "Substantially Prevailed" Standard, 1984 Utah Law Review 573.
Chapman v. State: Hypnotically Refreshed Testimony - An Issue of Admissibility or Credibility, 1983 Utah Law Review 381.
PUBLISHED CASES
Wilcox v. Anchor Wate, Co. 164 P3d 353 (Utah 2007)
Mardanlou v. Ghaffarian 135 P3d 904 (Utah App. 2006)
American Ad Management v. GTE Corp., 92 F.3d 781 (9th Cir. 1996)
Zions First Nat'l Bank v. Fox & Company, 931 P.2d 142 (Utah 1997)
American Ad Management v. General Te. Co. of Cal., 190 F.3d 1051 (9th Cir. 1999) | 